Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

Forum: BoaterTalk
Date: Jun 02 2008, 19:24 GMT
From: echo2001

Add Message

Either is fine, the 4 cyl gets about 1-3 mpg more, but the 6 is a fair amount stronger. <NT> Terrell New

Personally I just bought in march the 2.5 ltre 5 speed whirlybird New

I have sold 2 of my last three subaru 4 cyl. w/ over 240,000 and the one before that w/ 190,000. <NT> Terrell New

4 cyl plenty of power (but neither is a race car) ScottBarnes New

Own a Honda Prelude VTEC 225,000 miles looking to get a New Outback as my new shuttle vehicle <NT> echo2001 New

4 cyl is just fine..... river.runner New

4 cyclinder is fine -- I put 2 boats and a rocket box on top and set the ... davegg New

Subaru fours are geared quite "short," so that cruising in 5th is like being in 4th. Car never lugs, just poke the pedal ezwater New

See my post on the LL board about the turbo-diesel coming in 2010 or so.  48-49 mpg. <NT> Terrell New

and my follow up about US vs. UK gallons.  Still a 40mpg outback would be SWEET! tcookson New

2.5 liter is a bad engine.  Stay away. Otter New

I have a 99 that runs like a top. <NT> davegg New

I am aware that some people have had good luck Otter New

My OBS with a 2.5 runs strong and holds oil after 100k fairly abusive miles. <NT> curtis_elwood New

That's right around when I started having significant, recurring problems.  Good luck with your car. Otter New

2003 Outback 197K miles -teledave- New

<No Subject> wsboater New

have two subaru's with the 2.5 liter - both great cars for boating, the 3.0 recommends premium making it more $ to drive ronzo New

The accelerator will lag a bit due to the drive by wire but its predictable so no worries.   -teledave- New

I am running Unld. Plus and no problems with the 3.0 riverotter2 New

I have researched some problems and.... echo2001 New

Subaru and LL Bean no more......contract broken <NT> echo2001 New

These guys have been converting them for aircraft use gevans New

Add Message