Userid: Password:
BoaterTalk
BoaterTalk
BoaterTalk: The International Information Site for the Whitewater Paddler

Forum
Forum: BoaterTalk
NRS

Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

note Nothing can substitute for actually seeing the run New

Forum: BoaterTalk
Re: question Attn Cheoah Paddlers love2kayak New
Re: note @ 1000 cfs probably 28-29 - Def not 30 - Numbers and Top Yough I would put above Cheoah cbkoontz New
Re: th_up 28.5 <NT> Skully New
Re: note WTF?!! dude Tellico is listed as a 28- no way only a .5 difference between Tellico and Cheoah... Jayrockin New
Re: idea tellico is overrated bankfull1 New
Re: note If people are looking for a fool proof rating system, they are in the wrong sport... RUwet New
Re: note There's no fool proof rating system, but I think they have advantages. SciFisch New
Re: note ok, you tell me how this more complex rating system helps you know more about the cheoah.... RUwet New
Date: Jun 05 2008, 3:11 GMT
From: SciFisch

But I view this rating system as beta.

I could ask my buddy who always says rapids are classified too high (and I often do), or some random person who might have been down it once, or some guy I met on the river (too often scared shitless, or too cool to give decent advice). So why not also look at the collective opinion of a bunch of boaters? It's not like more information can hurt you.

Add Message

th_up No doubt the rating system is beneficial information.  Just some people rely on it too much, that's all i'm sayin'. RUwet New
NRS

Add Message