|
|
|
You said:
Killing the poor Iraqui's? So far we have freed 50 Million people from totalitarian regime's that were repressive
Answer
Don’t rush such statements. We disposed a dictator but, have not “yet” liberated anyone in Iraq. Liberation comes when the US occupation ends, which, will only happen when the last US troops will leave Iraq. Want to bet on a date for that?
Also remember that the US liberated Iran too (according to its timely propaganda) and installed the Shah for the same reason as we got rid of Saddam. Interestingly, the Iranians refused to feel liberated just as the Iraqis refuse to see Americans as liberators, at this time. We've been trying to "liberate" Iraq since the early 1970's when they nationalized their oil companies and signed on with the Soviets. Those are the facts.
You said:
Many European's, the French in particular, had billions invested in Iraq and it's oil.
Answer:
So what? What proof do you have that the French have any ulterior motif regarding Iraq? You may want to practice this following sentence:
“The French were right on each of their points for opposing this war.”
You said:
For almost a 100 years we have minimized the amount of injustices in the world.
Answer:
You either did not learn your history or attended history classes which colored the US history with rose colored glasses. We had done more than our share of injustices to the people of the world during the last 100 years. The list is very long and very historically available.
You said:
The Middle East would be under Russian control and Europe under German rule it weren't for the sacrifice of the Greatest Generation.
Answer:
Why would the Russians control the Middle East? They had all the oil that they needed and more, unlike the US and the West that have to depend on other people’s natural resources. They (Russians) were always exporting oil to dozens of countries.
The implication that the US's Greatest Generation saved Europe is also very optimistic, historically speaking, as most European historian would agree that Germany would have been defeated without any US help. Germany lost the war in Russia. The US help was nice but was not a critical turn of events for Europe.
You said:
If a war on terroism is to be won, our presence, for good or ill, is mandatory in the Middle East.
Answer:
We and our Western allies CREATED terrorism in the Middle East by the establishment and subsequent unconditional support for Israel and by our shared policy with the British to control the Middle Eastern natural resources. Thus, our presence will only inflame terrorism, instead of winning the war against it. Can’t you see what is happening in Iraq?
Can't you see that this US/British dominance of Arabia is simply the extension of the Christian West's Crusades that started in the year of 1094?
|
|
|
We need to think a bit deeper... New 
BoaterTalk 
