Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

Forum: LiquidLounge
Date: Mar 18 2008, 14:10 GMT
From: CharlieJohnson

	How has this particular case not been brought up here previously.  Based strictly on the constitution and the amendment, it seems to me to be a very easy case to decide.   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23688073/

Add Message

This specific case has been discussed here several times. Actually, davegg New

"Pink Pistols"....? decker New

I kid you not. <NT> davegg New

a quick google search shows... <decker clears browsing history> decker New

pretty funy that the gun on the pink pistols website isn't even pink TheBroncoKid New

Whew, thanks Dave, you have restored my faith in BT. <NT> CharlieJohnson New

I had dinner last nite w/ a guy from England....he said since they took the guns away from the public.. Linwood New

What part of "well regulated" do the anarchists fail to understand? <NT> Oci-One.Kanubi New

As you well know, the NRA types only quote part of the wording generally ... davegg New

maybe look into the background of that wording a bit by the folks that wrote it ronzo New

Yet during the drafting of the Constitution the subject was NOT addressed. The closest davegg New

I went a step further, and looked up the meaning of the word "regulated" in a dictionary from the 1700's... rlhartman New

That's an interesting question. Chrisj New

It's a bit of a red herring too snowwrestler New

if the central question is really to what extent the right to own weapons can be restricted... Chrisj New

I've been an outspoken proponent of arming bears for years <NT> snowwrestler New

Add Message