BoaterTalk: LiquidLounge: In other words, the south could have seceded over anything, and the war would have been fought. If the south had not

Home

Forums

BoaterTalk: The International Information Site for the Whitewater Paddler

Forum: LiquidLounge

Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

In other words, the south could have seceded over anything, and the war would have been fought. If the south had not New

Forum: LiquidLounge
Re:

props to sj for that long ass thread. It seemed to wake up the lounge TheBroncoKid New
Re:

Yeah, GRITS and Louie kicked those yankee asses. Learning_to_Swim New
Re:

no way... Rick won... has anyone refuted his information yet? decker New
Re:

They yelled. They screamed. They didn't like it. They insluted me... rroberts New
Re:

at least 5 people have <NT> TheBroncoKid New
Re:

No. No one has shown where the links to the information I posted was incorrect.... rroberts New
Re:

Because refuting them is unnecessary - the NORTH fought the war in order to preserve the union. GRITS New
Date: Jul 03 2008, 1:15 GMT
From: GRITS

seceded, slavery would have continued.

Thus it follows that while slavery may have been the primary concern and reason for seceding, it was NOT the reason the North made war on the south.

Add Message

Yes it was because it was the root cause of the breakup. <NT> rroberts New

Add Message