Userid: Password:
BoaterTalk
BoaterTalk
BoaterTalk: The International Information Site for the Whitewater Paddler

Forum
Forum: RaftZone
NRS

Clear all "New" markers Turn on extra data

Thread View Frames View Board View

note I have a question about the 50/50 launch allocation New

Forum: RaftZone
Re: note Judge Dismisses Case Against Park Service rich.p New
Re: note So What Does it Really Mean, Blanche??? rich.p New
Date: Nov 30 2007, 21:28 GMT
From: Gordo

Gordo
I noticed an absence of commercial traffic on my last trip in October. There were a few commercial rowing trips, but no motor trips. How does the 50/50 allocation ratio fit in with the more desirable season launches? Are the dates that the private boaters have picked up primarily during the winter months when the outfitters don't want them anyway?

Add Message

note <No Subject> rich.p New
note You are right Gordo TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note I respectfully disagree that this is not the proper venue for this discussion, this is exactly what RZ was created for Gordo New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Ice Gordo New
note Cold but not sold, and your access impereled TomMartin New
note An adverse ruling and a book do not an injustice correct TomMartin New
note I do agree with Rich on one aspect of venue, it's clear that this discussion has gone on elsewhere. Gordo New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Brilliant Idea and a One Sentance Position statement TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Not Bad TomMartin New
note Details rich.p New
note You have to save the document in RTF, THEN copy and paste from the saved document Gordo New
note Rich, don't worry... Pinecricker New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note <No Subject> Pinecricker New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Lots to comment on: Here's the agreement TomMartin New
note Here We Go Again rich.p New
note Agreement good for at least 6 more years TomMartin New
note My appologies TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Rank and File vote on the arbitration TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Union example TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note wilderness and access TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Some facts: TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note I am a lawyer and I read the decision and I don't think you are mirage New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note I stand by my statement. <NT> mirage New
note 4 way agreement missed out 17 other groups TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Simplisity and the Pill TomMartin New
note Quick Follow-up rich.p New
question Question for Tom Gordo New
note National Park, Wilderness and River Traffic TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note You can't side step the facts TomMartin New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
question Wilderness designation itself would not prevent motors from being grandfathered Gordo New
note That's for Congress to decide TomMartin New
question Is the issue the motors themselves or the fact that most motorized traffic is commercial? Gordo New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note It's Both TomMartin New
question A couple more questions for you Gordo New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note That is similar to the verbiage used for motor use in the Main Salmon Gordo New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note I don't know if you missed it Gordo New
note <No Subject> rich.p New
note Motors are still allowed in the Everglades too, unfortunately. <NT> Pinecricker New
NRS

Add Message