Userid:
Password:
Login
Register
Home
Forums
Resources
User
Commercial
Reference
BoaterTalk
Bugs
LiquidLounge
LostAndFound
Planner
RaftZone
SurfZone
TVF
What's new?
TVF
Articles
Event
Forums
Gallery
Gauges
GearSwap
Polls
Reviews
User List
Weblogs
Wifi Access List
Message Inbox
Register for BoaterTalk
What is my Password?
User Agreement
Dealer Locator
Advertiser List
Commercial Directory
Media Kit
FAQ
Search Forums
Help
Search for Product
Search via Google
BoaterTalk: The International Information Site for the Whitewater Paddler
Forum: RaftZone
Clear all "New" markers
Turn on extra data
Thread View
Frames View
Board View
<No Subject>
New
Forum:
RaftZone
Re:
Judge Dismisses Case Against Park Service
rich.p
New
Re:
So What Does it Really Mean, Blanche???
rich.p
New
Re:
I have a question about the 50/50 launch allocation
Gordo
New
Re:
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Re:
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Re:
I respectfully disagree that this is not the proper venue for this discussion, this is exactly what RZ was created for
Gordo
New
Re:
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Re:
Rich, don't worry...
Pinecricker
New
Date:
Dec 02 2007, 0:43 GMT
From:
rich.p
Hi Pinecricker,
In the interest of getting a little more precise feedback, I was wondering what I've said that would make you think GCPBA is an instrument of the outfitters?
Thanks.
Rich Phillips
Add Message
<No Subject>
Pinecricker
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Lots to comment on: Here's the agreement
TomMartin
New
Here We Go Again
rich.p
New
Agreement good for at least 6 more years
TomMartin
New
My appologies
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Rank and File vote on the arbitration
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Union example
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
wilderness and access
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Some facts:
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
I am a lawyer and I read the decision and I don't think you are
mirage
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
I stand by my statement.
<NT>
mirage
New
4 way agreement missed out 17 other groups
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Simplisity and the Pill
TomMartin
New
Quick Follow-up
rich.p
New
Question for Tom
Gordo
New
National Park, Wilderness and River Traffic
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
You can't side step the facts
TomMartin
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Wilderness designation itself would not prevent motors from being grandfathered
Gordo
New
That's for Congress to decide
TomMartin
New
Is the issue the motors themselves or the fact that most motorized traffic is commercial?
Gordo
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
It's Both
TomMartin
New
A couple more questions for you
Gordo
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
That is similar to the verbiage used for motor use in the Main Salmon
Gordo
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
I don't know if you missed it
Gordo
New
<No Subject>
rich.p
New
Motors are still allowed in the Everglades too, unfortunately.
<NT>
Pinecricker
New
Add Message